Lorraine Tipton of American Mothers Political Party Pt. I: Advocate or Abuser?

LORRAINE TIPTON

lorshower

(Nice towel—please DON’T show us any more!!)

ALSO KNOWN AS:

Lorraine F Tipton

Lorraine Freeman Tipton

Lorraine Fetterly

Lorraine Freeman 

Lorraine Tipton aka Rainy68

ONLINE HANDLES:

Badass Mama

Mama Liberty

Rainy

Rainy68

RainyGirl68

Tipton68

Roo (Joeysalittlekid)

WEB PAGES:

Rights 4 Mothers: http://rights4mothers.org

Mama Liberty’s Web Blog: http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com

Posts for the AMPP Facebook page

Plays a prominent role with gal pal Claudine (Petunia Pig) on Glenn’s Cult: http://glennscult.blogspot.com

DOB: August 17, 1968

VOCATIONAL BACKGROUND:

Graduate Coleman High School, Class of 1986

Cosmetology

Selling Candles

ROLE IN THE MOTHER’S MOVEMENT:

Co-Founder of American Mothers Political Party (AMPP). Media/PR Relations, AMPP. Presenter at Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC).

Lorraine refers to AMPP as “a bunch of talking vaginas”.

LOCATION: Wisconsin

BACKGROUND:

 At this time, ATW will reserve comment on Lorraine’s two custody cases, other than to include these comments that are from her own words, and give insight to the concerns of the Court in Lorraine’s family situation, and parenting ability. Child custody litigation is complex, especially when abuse allegations are involved, and when the case extends over a number of years. ATW would like to express our support to the children involved, we sincerely hope that despite past difficulties, that all of you go on to enjoy happy and successful lives.

 Lorraine has 3 daughters from a first marriage, she lost custody of the children to their father during a divorce and custody ruling in 1997. According to Lorraine, “Frank Calvert, of Oconto County, (was) the GAL on my divorce/custody proceedings in 1997 who recommended custody to my ex abusive husband-.. It was also Mr. Calvert who made sure that in his recommendations that in order for me to have primary placement with my older three daughters I was to have a “stable living environment away from Craig Hensberger”. http://thesharedparentingdisaster.blogspot.com/2009/10/hero-mother-her-story.html

 Though the ex husband retained custody of the 3 children, Lorraine did have regular visitation. 

Despite the concerns of the Court, Lorraine continued her relationship with Craig Hensberger (they never married) and in 1998, she gave birth to a daughter. Lorraine became involved in an intense custody dispute with Craig . The abuse allegations and reports are ongoing, Lorraine alleges that Craig abuses her daughter and is an alcoholic. Craig has a criminal record, and denies all allegations made by Lorraine.

According to Lorraine,”…the sitting judge on the case, Judge Miron, also made his threats again that maybe he would ‘contact CPS because neither one of us is a fit parent and maybe he should take he away from both of us’… He stated that maybe foster care was the best place for her. “ http://thesharedparentingdisaster.blogspot.com/2009/10/hero-mother-her-story.html

Judge Miron

Lorraine has posted details about the custody case involving her fourth child online, including the legal name of her child, and the graphic details of the abuse allegations. ATW strongly believes that children deserve privacy, and that posting their real name and sensitive details about abuse online for all to see is traumatic, and creates a public history that follows the child, even into adulthood. Anyone going online—potential employers, college recruiters, a potential boy/girlfriend etc—will be able to look up that child’s name, and read details of the parent’s custody battle, and abuse allegations. The child then loses their ability to form their own identity, and becomes defined by the past—as a victim. This is extremely unfair, and takes away the privacy a child deserves. There is a proper place to report abuse, and a proper way to advocate for your child, posting your child’s name/identifying information and revealing graphic details of abuse all over the internet is reckless and dangerous, and only causes more harm to the child.

 Lorraine also went on the “Glenns Cult/Petunia Pig” website to make fun of and “expose” her alleged abuser, Craig Hensberger. At one point, it appears Craig considered filing a libel case against Lorraine because of what was posted on “Glenns Cult”. ATW has to wonder if you are truly afraid of your abuser, who now has custody of your vulnerable child, why would you go online and aggressively post material that would likely provoke his anger and place your child in jeopardy?

Craig Hensberger on "Glenns Cult"

Craig Hensberger on “Glenns Cult”

 

Second marriage 2007 to Chadden (Chad) Lewis Tipton (b. 1970). No children.

——-

NEXT PT. II: Advocate or Abuser? Lorraine Tipton’s extensive record of stalking, harassment, defamation, threats and bullying.. 

 

Abusers in the Mother’s Movement Pt 1: Barry Goldstein &AMPP; Claudine Dombrowski

One can only guess what is happening in the dark corners of the Mother’s Movement…

A bare bulb swings over a battered wooden table—deals have been made here, alliances forged, things that cannot be mentioned…. From the shadows a gold ring is produced, on which a single goat with ruby eyes and sharply curved horns shines. Goats have been the symbol of this organization for centuries.
“Kiss the ring”, a husky voice solemnly commands, “And it is done.”


A large, hairy hand picks up the bulky ring, admiring its power; it’s significance. Much like a goat, he protrudes his chapped lips and loudly smacks them against the ring.
They will not publicly announce their alliance. They will obscure the connection. Attack anyone who comes close to the truth. People believe what they want, not what really is.
A new predecessor has been named, and the change will sweep the Movement like wildfire…

This fictional account is based on the strange ramblings of Claudine Dombrowski (Co-Founder of the AMPP Attack Mothers)…at first glance, perhaps these writings could be dismissed but one has to wonder about the alliances being forged, the secret deals being made, and why leaders in the Mother’s Movement are so willing to accept the criminal and abusive behavior of Claudine and the American Mothers Political Party (AMPP).

cdmind2

Claudine Dombrowski “whips” family court into shape!

LUNDY BANCROFT SPEAKS OUT: NO TO ABUSE!

(July 18, 2013) After enduring years of abuse and vicious online bullying inflicted by Claudine Dombrowski and her gang of AMPP Attack Mothers, domestic violence speaker and advocate, Lundy Bancroft writes a public letter acknowledging the abuse and online harassment directed towards Protective Mothers Alliance International (PMA) and co-founder, Janice Levinson, is not acceptable, and he will no longer work with those behind the attacks—Claudine Dombrowski of American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) and anyone who supports them.

Bancroft stated in his open letter to the Mother’s Movement that  “ We cannot fight against the power and actions of abusers, and of the courts that enable them, while we remain silent and acqiescent in the face of severely abusive of treatment of our own allies.”

PMA, an advocacy group for victims of abuse and family court injustice, had previously established itself as a “No Abuse Zone”.

Lundy Bancroft’s Statement: http://lundybancroft.blogspot.com/2013/07/defending-womens-rights-activist-who-is.html

ATW Reporting on Bancroft’s Statement & the Attacks: http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/07/22/important-lundy-bancroft-speaks-out-ampp-attacks-on-protective-moms/

 

THE RESPONSE – CLAUDINE STRUGGLES FOR CONTROL, APPOINTS BARRY GOLDSTEIN

(July 20, 2013) Claudine’s response to Bancroft’s public statement is to escalate the abuse by continuing to post defamatory and vulgar posts against Bancroft, co-founder Janice Levinson, PMA as a whole and anyone who is labeled as the enemy.

AMPP declares war on Bill Windsor and Lawless America.. tells the Mothers Movement that you “better think twice about sleeping with THIS enemy!”.
Sleeping with ??

In a long, rambling letter written much like a funeral eulogy—and too often praising herself, Claudine Dombrowski declares that the esteemed Lundy Bancroft is “such a good kiss ass and good little oppressor”. Actually, you read between the lines, it appears Claudine’s problem with Bancroft is that he does not kiss her ass! It should also be noted that in researching, ATW found no evidence that Bancroft or PMA International has ever taken the role of or taken credit for being “leaders” in the Mother’s Movement. Quite the opposite, Bancroft does not seek media attention or praise for himself, but appears to keep the focus on supporting abused women, and raising awareness of family court failures. And Levinson seems focused on supporting mothers, and raising awareness of family court injustices—not placing emphasis on herself or seeking personal attention.

Claudine on Lundy Bancroft, “..such a good kiss ass and good little oppressor..”

Reply to Lundy Bancroft – Change is here, Lead, Follow or get out of the way. Human Rights. July 20, 2013. http:// claudinedombrowski.blogs pot.com

Claudine’s next step is to find someone willing to work with an abuser and criminal, and someone who will look the other way when advocates and protective moms are being abused and attacked.

Who is this person??

::drumroll::

Barry Goldstein!

Claudine says the Mother’s Movement must change..and Barry represents that change

**********

ATW has documented some of the vicious attacks and criminal behavior of Claudine and the AMPP Attack Mothers including:

AMPP Wages War Against Protective Mother’s Alliance International: http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/02/20/breaking-news-ampp-wages-war-against-protective-mothers-alliance-intl/

Bill Windsor, “I fear for my safety and the safety of my family..” http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/03/27/windsor-fear-for-safety/

Lorraine Tipton on the BMCC (The steely cold side of “mother’s rights” unmasked and unedited) http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/05/02/lorraine-tipton-bmcc/

Please continue to visit Among the Wolves for continued updates  on the Mother’s Movement, and the Abusers Hiding Within 

Maria Bauer Melinn: Advise for Moms in court: Benadryl!

mmbenadryl[1]

Maria Bauer Melinn reveals her strategy for abused women dealing with traumatic family court procedures: Benadryl! Is Maria qualified to give medical or legal advise? Nope!

Read more on Maria’s latest exploits…

How Sick and Disabled is Maria Bauer Melinn??
Maria wants us to believe that she is so disabled, and debilitated with life-threatening heart problems that it is impossible for her to serve any time in jail–and this punishment for contempt may endanger her life. Maria has even posted pictures of herself online, showing that she is in a hospital with heart monitors taped to her chest, her face devoid of its usual flirtations. With the last of her failing strength, Maria lifts the cell phone and pushes a button.., snap! snap! A selfie reveals one last valiant stand against “injustice”.

And in a snap, everything can change– but look at this  screen shot, Maria is commenting to another mother who is pro se in a family court matter, offering help. Maria says that she is able to “call a DV shelter on Monday” before she goes to jail. Maria is acting as an advocate and willing to “talk about strategy”.

If Maria is strong enough and of sound mind so that she is able to advocate for other moms, and is able work with other domestic violence organizations in order to “help” another mom with a very difficult and time consuming family court situation… then her claims of being so sick to the point of death are highly suspect.

Michael’s Wish: “Maria Claims She Cannot Work a Job”
http://www.michaelswish.com/maria-claims-she-cannot-work-a-job

Maria Melinn Broke Back on Motorcyle http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/09/23/maria-bauer-melinn-broke-back-motorcycle/

Maria’s Advice to Moms in Family Court: Take Benadryl!
This mom is pouring her heart out online, giving very sensitive and personal details about her family court situation, which are now made public due to her disclosures. Maria is encouraging this mom to keep talking, and to go public–with little regard for this mom’s safety or privacy, and the possible implications for revealing so much.

Maria’s advice to help this mom cope in family court: “Many Moms find Benadryl helps on court days..”

Possible side effects of Benadryl include: Drowsiness, Dizziness, Mood Swings, Blurred Vision, Confusion and Irregular or Fast Heartbeat. Allergic reactions to Benadryl can cause seizures, difficulty breathing, swelling of the face/tongue and severe dizziness.
http://www.webmd.com/drugs/drug-5680-Benadryl+Oral.aspx

What would happen if a mom actually took Maria’s advice and popped some Benadryl right before going into family court, especially a mom who is pro se or acting as her own attorney? Would it look good before the judge if the mom was falling asleep…if she had a sudden change in mood that affected her ability to represent herself…if her tongue swelled and she could not speak for herself in court or even breathe…..if she got dizzy or confused? Or what if the Mom had a drug interaction related to Benadryl and a medication she was already taking? How would the abuser to react to that? How would the Judge respond, the Guardian ad Litem or other court professionals?

ATW finds it alarming, and frankly irresponsible for Maria–who has NO MEDICAL TRAINING and is not a licensed medical provider– to suggest Benadryl to anyone, even worse a vulnerable mom desperate for help. Maria’s advice could potentially 1) endanger the health of a mom taking her advise and 2) have a severe and negative impact on her court case–and the relationship she has with her children if she appears to be impaired or drugged, or is unable to represent herself due to the effects of Benadryl.

Did Benadryl Contribute to Maria’s Heart Problems?
ATW can only speculate, until we have proof, but Maria’s suggestion to take Benadryl, makes you wonder if Maria is also taking Benadryl to cope with her clegal issues. One of the side effects of Benadryl is fast or irregular heartbeat, and once ingested Benadryl is almost impossible to trace.

From a report on Maria:”Domestic violence victim Maria Melinn, an ethnic Hebrew-American (genealogically verified), was subjected to these abuses, in violation of her ADA orders, right here in Allegan County, Michigan this month. She has been denied most of her heart and cholesterol medications by the Jail’s medical staff during the first 6 days of her 60-day unlawful detainment, as well as her physician-mandated mattress, wheelchair, heart monitor (via denial of the charging cord for the unit’s receiver), and physical therapy sessions for her back..As a direct result, Ms. Melinn has had 2 cardiac incidents after only 6 days under these conditions. She had a severe episode of chest pain, angina, and tachycardia on the 3rd day of her unlawful detainment, and another cardiac event on day 6. She was admitted into the progressive intensive care unit of the hospital that evening with severe chest pain and other cardiac symptoms. Her condition was able to be stabilized after nearly 24 hours of in-patient care.”
http://allegancountylegaldocs.wordpress.com/tag/maria-melinn/

Benadryl could pose a risk to Maria’s health.. so why would she advise it to someone else?

Maria Implicates Barry Goldstein
Maria goes on to offer her unprofessional and uneducated legal assistance to this mom. Keep in mind that Maria has no legal training, no law degree and a majority of her “advocacy” training was given by the disgraced American Mothers Political Party (AMPP), where Maria once was president. AMPP has been recently exposed for their criminal acts of stalking, harassment and defammation. Their leader, Claudine Dombrowski, is facing criminal charges and has a protective order filed against her (other evidence suggests that Claudine is a serial stalker with a long history of harassment towards others).

Maria implicates Barry Goldstein as being a partner in offering advocacy services for abused women in court, whether this is true or not cannot be validated–but that Maria would use his name so publicly, and so freely could only mean they share a close relationship–or that Maria wishes they had one.

Maria states, “I will talk with you about strategy etc. in the courtroom”
Maria then goes on to offer up the services of Barry Goldstein: “we will work on how to handle cross examination… I am sure Barry will also talk to you about strategy too.”
Barry Goldstein is a former attorney now working as a domestic violence advocate, speaker and author. He does not have a current law license and cannot legally give any legal advise.
Common sense says there is only two ways to look at Maria’s implication of Barry:
1) Maria is dropping Barry’s name to give herself credibility, and to bolster her image as an advocate. And Barry may not be involved or is not aware of her remarks.
2) Barry is actively working with Maria–and the organizations she represents.
Either way this kind of advice presents a real danger for any protective mom who may be fooled into believing that Maria is a qualified advocate, and especially a danger that this advice may be used in court and jeopardize a mom’s case, and her custody/visitation.

 

The Gavel Slams Down on Cyberstalking Claudine Dombrowski…

From Bill Windsor of Lawless America:
“Bill Windsor of Lawless America puts Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party out of the stalking and threat business…

Claudine Dombrowski has been ordered to post nothing about me and remove all postings in regard to me…”


See FULL Statement at: http://claudinedombrowski.com/?p=176

How did Claudine Dombrowski get away with cyber stalking, harassment and online bullying for so long?

As tempting as it is to put all the blame on Claudine, she was enabled by sympathizers the Mother’s Movement (including many of those pictured below).

MOLC22

Many organizations in the Mother’s Movement not only looked the other way, and made excuses for Claudine as she continued to bully, harass and terrorize, but in some cases they promoted Claudine and her “Attack Mothers” ( AMPP). Anyone who tried to stand up to Claudine and her abusive ways were swiftly and viciously attacked, or forced into silence.

California Protective Parents Association (CPPA), Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE), Mothers of Lost Children (MOLC) and Safe Child Coalition work very closely together and might be run by the same small group of advocates-( see below; the same advocate who is a Chapter Leader for MOLC is also a Chapter Leader for Safe Child Coalition)

MOLC/NSCC

-all who have supported and actively promoted Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP. Their support and promotion continues even when all were aware of Claudine and AMPP’s abuse and cyber bullying towards Protective Mothers Alliance (PMA) and Lawless, and others. Also, it is very easy to go online and within seconds, see evidence in the search results that strongly suggest that Claudine has bullied, tormented, and made obscene postings about a number of people, and organizations. How could the Mother’s Movement continue to promote Claudine under these circumstances?

Claudine was a featured speaker at the Battered Mother’s Custody Conference (BMCC), speaking against abuse even as she was a perpetrator of abuse and other criminal acts.

Having her moment under the lights at the BMCC, was so important to Claudine that she canceled a scheduled visit with her daughter. Are these the actions of a mother who would do anything to see her child after a long estrangement?

SCREEN SHOT of CANCELLED VISIT

Claudine appeared in short documentary films produced by California Protective Parents Association ( CPPA). CPPA also encouraged people to join AMPP

SCREENSHOT CPPA REFERING PEOPLE TO AMPP

And Claudine has been supported by the Center for Judicial Excellence. Center for Judicial Excellence( CJE) and their leader Kathleen Russell Reportedly “Share Same Values” and “Work Very Closely Together” with AMPP:

Kyle Wigglesworth, an AMPP Attack Mother, struggles to defend AMPP on Barry Goldstein’s wall. Kyle has posted many false, misleading and defamatory comments on Barry’s wall against PMA, Bill Windsor and Lawless, and even attacking other protective moms.

These are just a few examples on how many professionals and organizations within the Mother’s Movement promoted Claudine and AMPP (the only exception ATW could find is Protective Mothers Alliance-PMA- International, and they became one of the primary targets of Claudine’s attacks).

That the Mother’s Movement would give refuge to an abuser like Claudine, and look the other way while she has caused real harm to countless victims should make you ask is any mother really safe? These are organizations that promote themselves to be domestic violence experts, advocates for women, and being such domestic violence experts they should know how to discern an abuser from a victim, an abuser from a traumatized woman, and then be able take action to protect and defend the victim. But if these organizations can’t do that within their own movement, how can they be expected and trusted to do that for protective moms in family court???

A.T.W. will continue to follow this story, and provide updates.. stay tuned

For More Info Read the Claudine Dombrowski Expose: http://claudinedombrowski.com

Claudine Attacks Her Supporter; Whose Side is She On!???

ATW has been threatened on the hate blog created by Claudine Dombrowski and American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) that if we do not shut down this blog, and stop offering readers this valuable information and unbiased reporting that they will continue to attack. The writers of ATW did not create this blog so that innocent people would be attacked by bullies. The bullies are responsible for their own behavior and actions–the trademark of a bully is that they blame the victim, and others, for their abusive behavior.

ATW will continue to publish facts backed up with proof. Claudine and AMPP are so obsessed with Janice Levinson that 1) she attacks her own supporter thinking it is Janice and 2) she continues to believe that ATW is Janice. ATW will work hard to expose these, and other lies…as you will see…

Claudine is so obsessed with destroying Janice Levinson and PMA that she is willing to attack one of her own supporters.

The following are quotes from Claudine’s hate blog, the words in bold/parenthesis are her own attacks on ATW and against this supporter (whose name we will keep anonymous for her own protection).

Attack #1: “A popular (you wish)..”

This advocate author of the above post ( Not Janice Levinson) is also well known in the Mother’s Movement. The “you wish” implies jealousy ( remember Claudine believes this is Janice Levinson) Claudine once said the author advocate of the above post’s mother is like a sister to her.

Attack #2: “advocate (for abusers) in the Mother’s Movement (name withheld to protect her privacy)..”

This advocate is an abuse survivor. Ironically she has also been the target online attacks unrelated to AMPP.

Claudine’s Obsession with Janice Levinson Results in her Mistakenly Attacking her own Supporter

Attack #3:”Anon Advocate (JANICE LEVINSON) was upset(BECAUSE YOU SLAUGHTER MOTHERS AND YOU ARE UPSET THAT THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE..”?)

We have withheld the advocate’s name to protect her privacy, she is NOT Janice Levinson and NOT associated with PMA. Claudine’s attacks against this advocate are totally unprovoked and unwarranted--once again Claudine is proving she is an abuser and is out of control in her obsession with Janice Levinson

Attack #4: “(As your doggy blog just cant seem to stop posting daily the battered mothers names)..”

Once again, ATW is NOT Janice, Lundy or PMA–we are a group of concerned citizens working to expose abusers hiding in victim advocacy groups.

Claudine Dombrowski started her blogs and online postings many years ago, it was her choice and her decision to use her real name, to use the real name of her child and post sensitive details about her case all over the internet. Public court records show that Claudine was asked to stop posting her daughter’s personal information all over the internet–and she refused to the point that the Court refused to allow Claudine to have access to the information because it was endangering her own child.

An insider reveals disturbing information about Claudine. “Take a long look at the massive court record of CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI of Shawnee County, Kansas…. is this a mother hero? She touts herself as “victim” but breaks the law whenever she wants to…”
http://womenwhohate.blogspot.com

All Claudine’s actions, (her blogs revealing her real name and internet postings about her court case and child’s private information) took place long before the creation of ATW. For Claudine to accuse ATW, other advocates and groups created AFTER Claudine blogs and online postings, of revealing her and her child’s identity online is simply a blatant lie.

Attack #5:” Even when the proof (the proof that moms are fight back at Windsor- and the proof that YOU JANICE LEVINSON are ASSITING BILL WINDSOR STALK humiliate and degrade COUNTLESS battered mothers) is pointed out to them, many advocates, professionals and organizations in the Mother’s Movement have chosen to defend/support/make excuses for the abuser and blame the victim for somehow deserving this brutality. (No, they just know the truth about you. Actually hurting, placing their very lives in danger, the battered mothers you purport to help)…”

This is yet another excuse for these bullies to abuse and torment, and instead of being held accountable for their criminal actions, they falsely pretend to be “victims”. Bill Windsor has only Legally defended himself against the criminal lies and vicious attacks on him, by certain mothers who just happen to also be in family court . This small group of mothers already revealed their court cases and personal info on the internet. AMPP has encouraged them to do so. Their family court issues are totally separate from the fact that they are cyber bullying, slandering and threatening Janice and Bill’s lives.

Claudine continues to mislead Protective Mothers with her lies and manipulations. She provides no proof for her numerous hateful allegations.

Attack #6: “(Claudine nor AMPP are connected BUT as MOTHERS – BATTERED MOTHERS we know we can and are safe behind the name AMPP- something that you are clueless to. Safety for Mothers)…”

This bizarre statement begins with a link to Claudine’s own blog, and an article she wrote called “Dreams Every Mother Has Them”. As you can clearly see from this screen shot, Claudine hides behind AMPP like a coward rather than taking responsibility for her criminal behavior.

-5

This is another way Claudine abuses Protective Mothers–she gains their sympathy, wins their trust and then throws them under the bus by making her supporters take the fall for her abusive and criminal behavior.

But in a past post -you can see- Claudine says the exact opposite;

” let the record be clear I and I alone maintain the website http://www.AmericanMothers.PoliticalParty.org Bill,you know this-and always have”

Clearly Claudine manipulates the truth depending on her agenda at that moment.


Let’s not get distracted by the offensive language and threatening tone of this AMPP hate blog…what you should really be asking is…

*** Why does AMPP and Claudine Dombrowski want to stop the progress of a few sincere advocates who are working to tear down, and expose the corruption within our government?

*** Why would Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP want to stop the progress of certain advocates who are working toward exposing and tearing down corruption in the court?

Is calling somebody a “c–” or a “b–” and scaring people away from the advocates and professionals asking these questions really making progress?

Claudine’s message to Lundy Bancroft: “F- You!!” Is this an advocate you would want to work with? Is this an advocate you would invite to speak at the BMCC? Is this an advocate you would promote, and proudly proclaim she is part of the Mother’s Movement?

****Whose side is Claudine on? Is she on the advocates side or is she on the side of corruption?

Viewing Claudine’s actions logically, methodically and calmly-peel away the layers of negativity, false accusations, hate and lies..what does Claudine and AMPP stand for?

They are spending all their time creating hate blogs, attacking advocates who expose corruption and tear it down.

This is creepy.. Claudine states she wants to “Get Rid of Janice”

***If Claudine were against corruption and wanted it exposed, why wouldn’t she join forces with these advocates? Instead she is creating distraction, halting progress and attacking the advocates trying to stop the corruption.

So whose side is Claudine REALLY on?

Breaking News from Mother’s Movement: When Abuse is Acceptable

When Abuse is Acceptable:
(As Long As it is Done By “Survivors” and to Professionals)

A popular advocate in the Mother’s Movement (name withheld to protect her privacy) lashes out after Lundy Bancroft issued a statement denouncing Claudine Dombrowski and American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) for their abuse. Anon Advocate was upset that other Protective Moms were voicing concerns about Claudine and AMPP, and the lack of response from the Mother’s Movement–which has become a very public debate which has fueled more vicious attacks, right in front of the eyes of the Mother’s Movement. Even when the proof is pointed out to them, many advocates, professionals and organizations in the Mother’s Movement have chosen to defend/support/make excuses for the abuser and blame the victim for somehow deserving this brutality.

According to Anon Advocate…We should be more understanding when “wounded survivors” attack, threaten and libel others. Claudine & AMPP are connected to this hate blog, and receiving sympathy from the Mother’s Movement even as they call Protective Mom & Advocate, Janice Levinson, a “c–” and a “b—” and post disgusting pictures that say “wild animal sex”. Is this becoming the norm in the Mother’s Movement?

Anon Advocate’s response…support the abusers hiding in the Mother’s Movement, the victims must be more tolerant of these deranged women because, after all, they did survive abuse!

This blog connects directly to the AMPP main site..see how they yell “F– You!” to Lundy Bancroft, call him a “cult leader” who “profits off moms” and states that “Lundy Bancroft is no different than many of our abusers”. The bottom of this Verizon shot reads “Comment As American Mothers..”

According to this Anon Advocate (direct quote) “we are dealing with wounded survivors and everyone deals with trauma in his own way” so basically we need to be more tolerant and understanding of the abusive behavior of attack mothers in the Mother’s Movement, and look the other way as they stalk, terrorize and harass others (many who are Protective Moms or Helping Professionals). In her opinion, the Professionals should not be protected because they are not survivors, and should be able to handle the abuse on their own or get help.

This screenshot (below) gives the new rules on how to deal with abusers, according to this advocate from the Mother’s Movement:

New Rules of Mother’s Movement from Anon Advocate.. Taking a stand against abuse, denouncing the actions of abusive advocates and supporting victims will no longer be “tolerated” because “we are not going to chose sides here”. “Those ‘Professionals” can take care of themselves or get the help they need’. Anon Advocate claims several professionals have reviewed the complaints, and support her in this.

<

Isn’t it concerning that an advocate Mother’s Movement is “warning” or threatening others to be silent about the abuse, and stating that their concerns will not be “tolerated”?

Anon Advocate even goes so far to say the victim does not have a right to defend themself because “this is about needs of the survivor”. This is an excuse for abuse. The above post by Anon Advocate prompts ATW to ask some logical and hard hitting questions; When does it become okay to frighten, intimidate and harm another person to suit the selfish needs of the abuser? Is this what the Mother’s Movement stands for? Is this the type of mind set and decision making skills “leaders” in the mothers’ movement possess? Are those in the movement unable to “walk their talk”? This person is considered an advocate and leader, really? Is this the best you can offer protective mothers in terms of support and safety? How can you ignore the abuse around you while advocating against abuse in family court?


Claudine Dombrowski threatens Bill Windsor with a .45, “Remember, Topeka has been known as the MENTAL HEALTH CAPITOL of the WORLD ha ha haha we got our rep honestly, we will put u in the funny farm ask questions later. ha ha ha ha
You will be better off just following me from the police station, It will be my pleasure to show you how to use a .45 up close and personal.
Put you out of your misery, mercy!” Claudine also refers to Bill Windsor as the “ball-less f– wonder” July 12, 2013 at 8:37 pm. http://angelzfury.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/bill-windsor-his-fake-movie-his-fake-threats-his-fake-balls-and-he-still-cant-get-his-rocks-off/

How can those in the Mother’s Movement justify Claudinine’s extreme behavior and a very obvious threat of harm against Bill Windsor and other protective mothers? And yet those who raise concerns, according to Anon Advocate, and expose the abusive advocate will not be “tolerated”! What will it take for the Mother’s Movement to take a stand against the abusive and threatening actions of some of their “leaders”..or are they changing the rules to excuse abuse, and blame the victims as they are being stalked and terrorized?

NOTE: In going through these screenshots and material of Claudine and AMPP’s abuse, some of our writers have reported nightmares and reacted in traumatic ways due to viewing this disturbing content. We cannot imagine how the victims are suffering, and especially the Protective Mother victims who have no support in the Mother’s Movement. Our heart goes out to them.