Pt: II- Lie vs Fact Check: Is Barry Goldstein Presenting Himself as a Family Law Attorney?

 

Suspended from the practice of law, is Barry Goldstein representing himself as an attorney to sell #TheQuincySolution? #StopAbuseCampaign

In Part I,”Lie vs. Fact Check: Barry Goldstein Lawyer (Cancel the Cabal)” http://abusiveadvocates.com/2014/10/19/barry-goldstein-cancel-the-cabal

ATW shared screenshots and comments from Barry’s first appearance on “Cancel the Cabal”  where Barry was advertised as a “child advocate lawyer”.  And as “Mother’s Advocate” and “Child Advocate Lawyer”. 

ATW also shared a screenshot of Maria Bauer Melinn, offering the services of Barry Goldstein to a mother in need of legal help...http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/11/07/maria-bauer-melinn-advise-for-moms-in-court-benadryl/

 

Here are other examples where Barry again seems to advertise or imply that he is an attorney…

 

From an Amazon advertisement, “The Quincy Solution Barry Goldstein” http://www.amazon.com/The-Quincy-Solution-Barry-Goldstein/dp/1934759864

Quote: “Barry Goldstein has practiced law in New York since 1978…many domestic violence agencies have referred clients to Mr. Goldstein because he is one of the few lawyers with expertise in domestic violence and because of willingness take cases on a pro bono or reduced fee basis…”

 

Also, the words of Claudine Dombrowski, American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) also imply that Barry is representing himself as an attorney…

Claudine says about Barry Goldstein offering legal assistance to mothers seeking help, “There is no legal resources or venue through Lundy or PMA, anytime a mother asks for his expert assistance or resources for legal the mothers are quickly shut out ignored. .. Has he or PMA helped any mother? No… Who has? ..Barry Goldstein is one such person. He has tried he continues to assist he knows that we–Mothers need strategy, legal representation, he steadfastly goes with the flow..”

What do Claudine’s comments about Barry mean? According to Claudine a change is needed in the Mother’s Movement, it should be torn down completely, and she will lead these efforts, along with her hand selected allies, which includes Barry Goldstein. Tearing down the Mother’s Movement means attacking and forcibly removing advocates, professionals and even abuse victims who stand in the way.   For more information about this screenshot, and the meaning behind it, please visit: “Abusers in the Mother’s Movement Pt. II Barry Goldstein & AMPP, Claudine Dombrowski” http://abusiveadvocates.com/2014/01/03/abusers-mothers-movement-pt-2-goldstein-dombrowski/

Let’s be very clear…Barry Goldstein is NOT a licensed attorney. When Barry did attempt to get his law license reinstated, it was denied. According to the terms of the disciplinary action taken against him, Barry Goldstein cannot give legal advice, cannot offer legal strategy and cannot take on legal cases in the capacity of an attorney pro bono or not.

Disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District:(December 30, 2008, MATTER OF GOLDSTEIN, BARRY L.)

ORDERED that the respondent Barry L. Goldstein, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years, commencing January 30, 2009, and continuing until further order of this Court, with leave to the respondent to apply for reinstatement no sooner than six months prior to the expiration of the said period of five years upon furnishing
satisfactory proof that during the said period he
(1) refrained from practicing or attempting to practice law;
(2) fully complied with this order and with the terms and provisions of the written rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10);
(3) complied with the applicable continuing legal education requirements of 22 NYCRR 691.11(c); and
(4) otherwise properly conducted himself; and it is further, ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Barry L. Goldstein, is commanded to desist and refrain from
(1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another,
(2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority,
(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and
(4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law….

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/decisions/2008/D21742.pdf

 

The Ninth Judicial District included in the findings that, We find the respondent’s utter failure to appreciate the fact that his conduct exceeded the bounds of propriety as a courtroom advocate, his complete lack of remorse, and the pervasive nature of his deceptive conduct to be aggravating factors…”

If Barry is not being honest about the status of his revoked law license, and in the past decisions of the Ninth Judicial District found Barry to be “dishonest” …how are to trust The Quincy Solution?

For more information on why Barry’s law license was revoked, plz read http://abusiveadvocates.com/2014/04/04/barry-goldstein-goat-advocate/

Advertisements

Lie vs. Fact Check: Barry Goldstein Lawyer (Cancel the Cabal)

Lie vs. Fact Check Intro:

As we meander down this truth seeking path together, there are some lies so outrageous that you have to see it to believe it. We at A.T.W. are all for exposing the Lies vs. Fact Check.

This is how it will go:

1) We will quote the lie, and post the source it came from.
2) This will be immediately be followed by a quote of the facts, with proof

 

THE LIE:

1) Barry Goldstein is a “Child advocate Lawyer”, intro

2) Barry Goldstein is a “Mother’s Advocate” and “Child Advocate Lawyer” 2:03. Barry does not refute this initial statement.

3) Gill Trebilcock says “Barry is an attorney from America who is influence very strongly by alot of feminists..” at 2:18. Then goes on to explain “At the moment Barry is not an attorney, because he took on a judge for being unfair. So he is taking a year off. So at the moment he describes himself as no longer an attorney but a good guy.”

The Truth:

1) Barry Goldstein is NOT a licensed attorney. For more information on why Barry’s law license was revoked, plz read http://abusiveadvocates.com/2014/04/04/barry-goldstein-goat-advocate/

2) Barry Goldstein’s law license has been suspended, he is not merely “taking a year off”. Barry made an appeal to re-instate his law license, which was denied.

In 2007, Barry Goldstein was brought up on 29 charges of professional misconduct by the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, only 8 charges were dismissed. Some of the charges involve Barry mishandling client funds while representing a non-profit organization, including transferring money in/out of accounts and failing to maintain a separate escrow for the organization he represented.
Barry was also found to have engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in a family court case he was representing. Also considered in the disciplinary action against Barry, We find the respondent’s utter failure to appreciate the fact that his conduct exceeded the bounds of propriety as a courtroom advocate, his complete lack of remorse, and the pervasive nature of his deceptive conduct to be aggravating factors…”

Barry’s law license was suspended for 5 years, and has not been reinstated. Barry attempted to get his law license reinstated, which was denied.

Further, “ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Barry L Goldstein, is commanded to desist and refrain from …(4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law..”

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/decisions/2008/D21742.pdf

Maybe Cancel the Cabal should have read this Facebook post from Barry before making any claims that he is a “Child advocate Lawyer” or “just taking a year off”…these false assertions are only a dream!

Interesting enough, if you go to the Cancel the Cabal website, they do not name Barry as an attorney. You only see that title on the YouTube posted video. Hmmmm

Is this just a fluke? Consider the words of Maria Melinn, offering the services of Barry Goldstein to a mother in need of legal help...http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/11/07/maria-bauer-melinn-advise-for-moms-in-court-benadryl/

Maria says, “I will talk with you about strategy etc. in the courtroom..we will work on how to handle cross examination… I am sure Barry will also talk to you about strategy too.”

Barry is prohibited from giving legal advise pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, which clearly states that Barry cannot talk strategy as Maria suggests“(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto..”

Why would Barry attempt to offer help to mothers in family court, or anyone else for that matter?? Because Barry charges astronomical  fees working as a  paid expert witness….and expert witnesses are not subject to oversight by his peers and are not restricted by the previous disciplinary. Barry’s fees range from $100-$10,000. http://barrygoldstein.net/services/expert-witness

 This means all the money you will save implementing The Quincy Solution will then be funneled into Barry’s own services, and those in his inner circle of professional colleagues! Because Barry has set himself, and his inner circle, up as a paid expert with a permanent job in the new system he created.

 

 

 

Mother Goose Award: Claudine Dombrowski “Responsible for the Massive Father’s Rights Movement”

In review of our past posts, ATW has noticed because of the facts we have gathered, Claudine Dombrowski, of AMPP, has largely been presented in a negative light. Because of this, we are thrilled to announce something to report truly positive about Claudine…keeping in mind, that ATW only posts the truth backed up with proof or evidence, we want to take this opportunity to announce a new award specially designed for her.

Hats off to you Claudine aka Petunia Pig of the Glenn’s Cult Blog aka Angelz Fury aka Holocaust Historian Extraordinaire aka The Talking Vaginas aka Rhedde Carpet aka Impersonator of William M. Windsor aka Member of Alzheimer’s Lesbian Support Channel aka Dastardly Dads aka Walk On With Hope in Your Heart and You Will Never Walk Alone aka Powerpuff Girls and all those other aliases used…

The positive news is that Mothers are leaving AMPP, and are seeing the truth about Claudine’s “Wild Goose Chase” known as the American Mothers Political Party (AMPP). 

According to a comment on a page supporting Fathers and parental rights…“(Claudine) has caused a backlash from women in paternal families who are flocking to father’s rights groups in numbers I have never seen before. In essence, her (Claudine Dombrowski) and the likes of Barry Goldstein are responsible for the massive father’s rights movement.”

As such, we are giving Claudine the Mother Goose Award because she has led the Mothers on a “Wild Goose Chase” pretending to be an anti-abuse advocate who then has viciously attacked other Protective Mothers and Advocates like an abuser. Claudine has disgraced the Mother’s Movement and harmed the cause of family court reform  with her outrageous and criminal behavior. 

cdmind2

This screen shot posted by Claudine showing a woman whipping a man who is wearing a collar with chain connecting to AMPP, with “family court” written across his body, as he bends over on his hands and knees, is one example of how Claudine has disgraced the Mother’s Movement, and why she deserves this award.

Here’s to you Claudine… Honk! Honk!

 

 

 

 

California Safe Child Coalition: Children Should Maintain a Relationship with Abusers

The California Safe Child Coalition Believes Children Should “Maintain a Relationship” with an Abusive Parent… Is this What the Mother’s Movement Stands For?

The point of this article is not debate the merits of supervised visitation but to point out the conflicting messages of some of the leaders in the Mother’s Movement; that, on one hand, say children should be protected from an abuser, even to remove all contact with that parent  and, on the other hand, say an abusing parent deserves a relationship with the child they have harmed—and this relationship should be fostered, and encouraged to grow in supervised visitation (which will lead to unsupervised visits, and likely the alleged abuser will gain custody). SO what does the Mother’s Movement really believe?

 Quote:The California Safe Child Coalition works with national, state and local government agencies, private organizations and individuals to keep children safe.

We seek a massive culture shift in the California court system. We strive to endure that children remain safe in the custody of protective parents, while maintaining relationships with their abusing parents through court-ordered supervised visitation”. This includes parents who have sexually abused children.

 

WHO IS THE CALIFORNIA SAFE CHILD COALITION?

The California Safe Child Coalition is compromised of some of the largest organizations leading the Mother’s Movement today; many who have appeared at the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC). 

 

*************

The Center for Judicial Excellence, The Center (CJE). CJE’s Director helped to organize and lead the first ever Mother’s Day Protest at the White House.

Entity Name: CENTER FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE
Entity Number: C2790378
Date Filed: 05/23/2006
Status: ACTIVE
Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA
Entity Address:
Entity City, State, Zip:
Agent for Service of Process: JEAN A. TAYLOR (President , Co-Founder)

According to the 2010 Tax returns, the CJE Officers are:

Jean Taylor- President

Mary Lee Strebl- Vice-President

Cesar Lagleva- CFO/Treasurer

Royce McLemore-Director

Raphael Durr- Director

Marivic Bay Mabanag- Director

According to the taxes, these are all unpaid positions, working an average of 10-25 hours a week. CJE takes in a large amount of monetary donations, of which only $25 a year is membership dues (see below “Kathleen Russell and CJE Money Trail”).

California Protective Parents Association (CPPA)

Entity Name: CALIFORNIA PROTECTIVE PARENTS ASSOCIATION
Entity Number: C2178228
Date Filed: 10/06/1999
Status: ACTIVE
Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA
Entity Address:
Entity City, State, Zip:
Agent for Service of Process: KAREN ANDERSON

NOTE: CPPA originally opened as a charity and  later re-established itself as a corporation.

114556 Charity Current SACRAMENTO CA Charity Registration Charity

Karen Anderson (Director of CPPA)  has lobbied for legislation to limit the Court’s ability to order supervised visits for parents accused of sexually abusing their children. She is also a mediator working with families involved in the court system, working as a Certified Mediator in accordance with the California Dispute Resolution Programs. Anderson also calls supervised visitation a scam and a racket.

 

Mothers of Lost Children (MOLC)

Results of search for “Mothers of Lost Children” returned no entity records

Note: On Feb. 14, 2011 Karen Anderson (CPPA) held a protest with Mothers of Lost Children in Washington, D.C. to “protest the enormous expenditure or tax dollars to help get ex-prisoners and known abusers connect with their children, and the heartbreak for mothers when this funding is misused and misapplied.”  http://crispe.org/forum/index.php?topic=4667.0;wap2

 

Child Abuse Solutions (CAS), Child Abuse Solutions, Inc.

Results of search for “CHILD ABUSE SOLUTIONS” returned no entity records as being a corporation in California.
CAS is supposed to be an educational non-profit but no results were found at the National Center for Charitable Statistics. The information for CAS traces back to Meera Fox Attorney at Law.

 

Incest Survivors Speakers Bureau of California (ISSBC)

A “grassroots” organization of mothers raising awareness of child sexual abuse. ISSBC offers conferences, training, and accepts donations, filtering the money through CPPA: http://www.issb.us/donations.html. Results of search for “CHILD ABUSE SOLUTIONS” returned no entity records as being a corporation in California, and no results found of ISSBC found as a non-profit.

ISSB California Officers
Executive Director and Founding Member- Andrea Ransdell
Legislative Director- Heather Markert,
Research Adviser and Founding Member- Kathy Dreyer

The California Safe Child Coalition

Results of search for “The California Safe Child Coalition” returned no entity records.

 

*********

THE CONTRADICTION: QUOTES FROM THOSE IN THE MOTHER’S MOVEMENT AGAINST SUPERVISED VISITATION BETWEEN A CHILD & AN ALLEGED ABUSER

These statements from advocates and mothers in the Mother’s Movement directly challenge California Safe Child Coalition’s statement that abusive parents deserve a relationship with the children they have abused, and that relationship should be fostered in supervised visitation.  Keep in mind, the purpose of supervised visitation is temporary, and almost always results in unsupervised visitation, and increased custody.

Many of these leaders/advocates/mothers believe that a child who has been abused will be at risk for further abuse if they continue to have a relationship with a parent who has harmed them in the past, and that placing a child in supervised visitation with an abuser is traumatic. Many of these voices come from mothers who have been through the family court system, have dealt with supervised visitation, and witnessed its failures.

So who is the California Safe Child Coalition fighting for, and why??

From Barry GoldsteinWe have seen repeatedly that courts create an urgency to restore normal visitation to fathers even in the face of serious safety risks…The(re is) disparity in how supervised visitation is handled between mothers and fathers…the courts that couldn’t wait to resume visitation with a dangerous father are willing to delay years before resuming normal visitation with a safe mother…”

And, “Instead of pressuring mothers to cooperate with their abusers they can be using their power and authority to require him to stop his abuse if he wants to have a relationship with the children. It is important for legislators and court professionals to understand that children do not need both parents equally. They need the safe parent more than the abusive one and their primary attachment figure more than their other parent. ..” “The Broken Court System: Is There Reason for Hope?” by Barry Goldstein: http://www.barrygoldstein.net/important-articles

 

From “Family Court Matters” : FCM posted an article on corruption and greed within the supervised visitation provider network, many of their comments also seem applicable to California Safe Child Coalition.. “Why, becomes the question, would an anti-domestic violence (“End Domestic Violence” indicates they want it to stop) be collaborating with the infamous Supervised Visitation Field, which is known to spring out of the father’s rights and welfare reform fountain?”

 

And,Again, I have to ask, how could such a well-known (in the field) group go for so long absent any corporate existence? Not registered with the State of California to do business in California–but it sure looks like they are consistently billing and being paid to do business in California….” “Good Cause to Eliminate (Funding for): Access Visitation, Supervised Visitation, and Batterer’s Intervention, PERIOD!” http://familycourtmatters.wordpress.com/2013/11/29/good-cause-to-eliminate-funding-for-access-visitation-supervised-visitation-and-batterers-intervention-period/

From The Liz Library: “Supervised visitation cannot continue indefinitely, and controlling, violent, or child molesting parents aren’t going to change. So what is the point? ….

It’s a band-aid for 10 weeks, or 6 months, or whatever, and then the abusive parent will most likely go back to court, after behaving “safely” or “nicely” in the presence of supervisors, and get unsupervised visitation. The supervised visitation center will have made money, the parents will have lost money, the litigation will have remained open, the abusive parent will be even more angry and resentful, additional therapies and interventions will be recommended and tried (all as the abuse fades into the past and claimed irrelevancy), and overall, the entire situation will be even more miserable than it was before for the victims.” — The Liz Library, “Endless $tupidity: domestic violence victim advocacy for supervised visitation centers (Endless stupidity or professional self-interest–there’s no other choice.)” http://www.thelizlibrary.org/site-index/site-index-frame.html#soulhttp://www.thelizlibrary.org/supervised-visitation/supervised-visitation-stupidity.html

National Safe Child Coalition: Posted an article on August 12, 2103 about a man who killed his child during supervised visitation to spite his ex. NSCC followed with these thoughts, “They have dangerous people ordered into supervised visitation at the YMCA while protective parents who pose no threat are ordered into prison like rooms for supervised visitation with their children.”

*****

KATHLEEN RUSSELL AND CJE’S MONEY TRAIL INVESTIGATED BY FAMILYLAWCOURTS.COM: WHAT TAX RETURNS REVEAL

Source: http://www.familylawcourts.com/non_profits.html

Family Law Courts is investigating “DV advocates who don’t want to see women empowered” and they claim most advocates are corrupt, and in the business to make a profit, not help victims of abuse. 

Family Law Courts has investigated a number of individuals and non-profits including Kathleen Russell of The Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) aka “The Center”. Kathleen Russell is an unmarried woman with no children who is the co-founder and staff consultant at CJE. Why? Family Law Courts has pulled Russell’s tax records and raised allegations that CJE is just another money making organization within the family court system, similar to what protective mothers are fighting against.

Quote: (2008) “Tax records reveal in one year the Center for Judicial Excellence accepted grants and donations in the amount of $215,052.00 (Line “L”). Of that amount (Line 13) $187,000 went to outside sources. The source?

Page 4, Line 151. Kathleen Russell Consulting.”

Source 2008 Tax Returns Posted on Family Law: http://207.153.189.83/EINS/204892221/204892221_2008_054E013D.PDF

That’s means 86% of grants and donations to CJE went directly to Kathleen Russell Consulting. 

Source 2010 Tax Returns are posted on Family Law: Courts: http://207.153.189.83/EINS/204892221/204892221_2010_07496338.PDF

From 2006-2010, CJE took in $922,323 dollars in grants and contributions, if 86% were paid to Kathleen Russell Consulting that would earn her  $793,198 in 4 years. OR $198,299 dollars a year. With that large amount of money, you would hope to see a more substantial change in family court–not a solution that fosters a relationship between a child and an abuser, and throws the family back into the troubled family court system. 

EVEN CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI ADMITS: IT’S AL ABOUT THE $$ MONEY $$

Is it so far-fetched that the domestic violence advocates and leaders would compromise their stated goals to protect women and children to make a profit?

One more screen shot to consider…

This was taken from Barry Goldstein’s wall, keep in mind Barry is a former attorney who was disbarred after mishandling money belonging to a non-profit organization. Here Barry is begging his supporters “to contact local dv groups, colleges, and other other organizations that could sponsor (PAY) a program for me to speak at.”

Like Kathleen, Barry works as a speaker and consultant. What is a consultant? Someone who can give advice or share ideas about family court, domestic violence and related issues without a law license; and make a profit from speaking, public engagements, writing books, etc.

Claudine Dombrowski responds with this interesting comment,”Yo gf I’m awake. Eyes wide open 20 yrs. I also know that in the communities the heart people not all enjoy this you use what you can get it in any way you can. Through anyone you can.

It’s your choice. Try to balance like the dv orgs do (there funding is 3/4 fr tagged), or push the truth the common sense. Or…you can keep preaching to the choir… Put it where it needs to be.

 

Claudine Dombrowski: “Get it in any way you can”

Keep asking questions, and be open to uncovering the truth….

BARRY GOLDSTEIN : Goats, Abusers & Family Court

The “formal Battered Mothers Custody Conference” will NOT be held this year

images

 

Why the BMCC has declined to host a “formal BMCC” has not been disclosed.  As ATW has reported, the Mother’s Movement has encountered numerous problems throughout the year…many “advocates” in the Mother’s Movement who have promised help, and to reform  family court, have proven to be abusers, shameless self promoters, cyberstalkers and otherwise incompetent. And other leading organizations in the Mother’s Movement have supported, promoted and/or enabled these abusive advocates. The unprofessional behavior of many in the Mother’s Movement has hindered progress toward meaningful family court reform and caused fear and intimidation among those they are supposed to help. 

MOLC22

Advocates in the Mother’s Movement who support and enable Claudine Dombrowski (AMPP). Dombrowski has a protective order issued against her for harassment and criminal cyberstalking

Instead of a “formal conference”, the Battered Mothers and Kids Custody Conference (BMCC) will hold a “mini BMCC” at the George Washington University Law School.

 

The Mother’s Movement is rolling out the Astroturf grass to announce Barry “Goatstein, offering a lecture on “domestic violence advocate training”.

 

Remember, in 2009, the State of New York said about Barry, “his conduct exceeded the bounds of propriety as a courtroom advocate,” and then revoked his license to practice law for 5 years. With Barry’s revocation of his law license, and affiliation with a known abuser,  you have to wonder if he has the judgment and experience to be the domestic violence expert he claims to be? And knowing Barry’s questionable past, should he be lecturing at various domestic violence and family law conferences? Should Barry be offering training to advocates? Should Barry be training and educating family court judges about domestic violence and its harmful effects on children? And should Barry be offering advice to desperate protective mothers?

 

The following quotes and screenshots are public statements made by Barry Goldstein… 

 

1) Barry says Goats Are the Best Abuse Advocates because “Of course goats always protect their kids so we can learn from them”.

 

It is insulting that Barry really thinks a goat is more knowledgeable about protecting a child than their own mother, when he claims to be an advocate for mothers and sympathetic to their cause.

 

 

2) According to Barry, Goats Are Now the Symbol “For Our Cause”.

 

3) ARE goats an appropriate symbol for Barry’s cause?? And should abuse advocates, judges and other domestic violence professionals be learning from goats?

 

Goats can be dangerous, and aggressive! ..And have a strange obsession with urine.

 

 

Goats crave the taste of human urine—and will aggressively stalk men to drink their their urine, this has resulted in the death of a hiker who was attacked by wild goats. 

 

Hikers have been warned to maintain a distance from the goats, at least 50 yards away from them – half the length of a football field.

Mountain Goat safety tips: http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/olympic/home/?cid=stelprdb5412239

 

Harrowing story of a hiker’s close call with a mountain goat, “It was as if the sound of my zipper was a dinner bell. A narrow white face, curious, popped over a ridge 20 feet from my crotch. Then another one. Talk about stage fright, or performance anxiety. They approached confidently. They both stared at me, and I stared back at them, confused and anxious…”: http://semi-rad.com/2012/01/beware-the-urine-drinking-goats

 

Goats also spray themselves with urine prior to mating. Males goats urinate on their beards, legs and bellies to advertise their dominance. Sounds pretty sexist, huh? : http://listverse.com/2012/10/10/top-10-cute-animals-with-disgusting-toilet-habits/

 

4) According to Barry, he is celebrated by the rest of the animal kingdom for his “work to protect goats and kids”…

 

Here Barry receives a fishy breath kiss from Cailey the Dolphin, who can’t keep her fins off him, “Cailley the dolphin found out about my work to protect goats and kids and this was her immediate response.”

 

Barry compares Cailly to the family court judges, and said her kiss is quote “somewhat different from the reactions I have received from the various judges.”   

 

 

5) Barry says criminal cyberstalkers Claudine Dombrowski, Lorraine Tipton and the attack mothers at American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) “made enormous sacrifices for our movement”…while ignoring the abuse they have inflicted on other protective moms, their harassment towards other organizations working for changes in family court and their long history of cyberbullying and harassment (which continues to this day).

 

And then Barry says Bill Windsor, of Lawless America, is wrong for standing up to Claudine, and filing for a protective order to protect himself from the dangerous behavior and threats posed by Claudine and AMPP. Both Claudine and Lorraine made death threats against Bill Windsor, and also posted an online rant saying they want to “get rid of” domestic violence and family court advocate Janice Levinson (Protective Mothers Alliance International).

4) Barry says Claudine Dombrowski of AMPP, a Serial Stalker and Cyber Bully, is a “Legitimate Protective Mother” (seen screen shot below). What is that supposed to mean?  Is Barry so blindly in support of an abuser that he cannot empathize with the very REAL suffering and trauma of a mother struggling in family court against an abuser, and a system that has failed to uphold her rights and failed to protect her child?

Barry Goldstein supports serial stalker and cyberbully Claudine Dombrowski (AMPP) — even as she is attacking fellow professionals in the Mother’s Movement.

5) Does Barry have any Credibility after his License was Revoked?  In 2009, The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, State of New York, reviewed 29 charges of professional misconduct against Barry. Of which, 17 charges were upheld, 4 separate charges partly dismissed and 8 charges completely dismissed. As a result, Barry had his license revoked for 5 years and cannot practice law until it is reinstated. http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_10622.htm

The charges involve two separate issues:  A- The main part of Barry’s legal practice, at the time, was representing tenants for a non-profit housing resource center that offers a variety of help to assist families with housing issues, and to restabilize families facing crisis or homelessness. Barry’s actions hurt an organization working hard to help struggling families, and to build stronger neighborhoods–offering help free of charge to needy families.   13 of these charges have to do with Barry mishandling client funds; and specifically that Barry failed to properly manage an escrow account and was inappropriately transferring funds. Barry also failed to keep a separate checkbook for the attorney escrow account, and failed to obtain escrow checks bearing the title “Attorney Escrow Account” or “Attorney Special Account” or “Attorney Trust Account” which would clearly identify where the money was coming from, and who was managing the account.  When asked to respond to the complaint, Barry refused to answer. 

 

B-The second part of the complaint involves how Barry handled a family law case, it should be noted the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC) was also involved with this client, and their suggestion that the mother go public with her story, including revealing sensitive details about child abuse, may have had negative impact on her custody outcome. The judge  issued a gag order that the last name of the children should not be revealed in order to protect their privacy, and Barry released the last name in an online article about the case. Barry was found to have made dishonest, false and misleading statements to the Court, and to the public when speaking about this case.

Barry claims he is being attacked by the legal system for coming to the rescue of a protective mom…but where is the proof his statements are true? Where are the affidavits or witness statements in support of Barry? And looking at Barry’s delusional comments, and record of defending abusers—how is anyone supposed to “BELIEVE” anything he has to say?

 

6) Dreams, Barry Goldstein has them… Barry has Psychic Dreams about the Deceased President John F. Kennedy; they walked along the beach, and reminisced about their lives. President Kennedy sympathizes with Barry after reading the story about his court woes, “He said he could tell from the details that this was an injustice and it could not stand.” President Kennedy makes a few phone calls, and voila the Court is apologizing to Barry and reversing its decision!

 

Note the concern Barry shows towards those hurt by his actions–the non-profit and its clients, and the mother in family court are not given even one comment as the whole post is focused on Barry alone. The Grievance Committee noted that Barry showed a “complete lack of remorse” in their findings.

Barry Goldstein had a dream that John F Kennedy made a phone call and used his connections to reinstate Barry’s (revoked) law license

::Applause::

::Stomping of hooves::

 

2014_04_041396595994533e5d1a24c83

 

 

 

 

We think the Mother’s Movement can do better.

Please continue to read ATW for breaking news and updates as we reveal the “wolves in sheep’s clothing” working within the Mother’s Movement.

 

images

Abusers in the Mother’s Movement Pt 2: Barry Goldstein &AMPP; Claudine Dombrowski

CLAUDINE & AMPP: DISMANTLE THE MOTHER’S MOVEMENT

According to Claudine a change is needed in the Mother’s Movement, it should be torn down completely, and she will lead these efforts, along with her hand selected allies “DV orgs, awareness?? seriously?? They need to be dismantled and a new what is needed now– begun.”

AND, “Its out with the old in with the new and dammit what we are doing is not working. The moms know this they are the change and with strategy, political and legal. Now moving because of the strength of mothers coming out — then the movement must to change to support and foster that growth. eg. Barry strategy Representing the DV victim, BMCC learning to lobby… you see old is not good it is oppressive.”

Reply to Lundy Bancroft – Change is here, Lead, Follow or get out of the way. Human Rights. July 20, 2013. http:// claudinedombrowski.blog spot. com

As you read Claudine’s delusional letter, it strongly appears that she thought she was able to control Bancroft, and that she was somehow responsible for his success. Those feelings since have transferred to Barry.

Claudine attacks Lundy Bancroft in order to prop up Barry Goldstein – no one in the Mother’s Movement objects to this kind of abusive, and manipulative behavior

See for yourself…

This is how Claudine described Bancroft, at the beginning of the Mother’s Movement, when she supported him: “Then he published more books, does speaking, became our voice, the voice of the beaten, trembling, terrified battered mother..” (Note: There is NO indication that Bancroft wanted or asked for any recognition for his advocacy work for battered women, nor did he ever take credit for being “the voice” of battered women.)

What is Barry Goldstein doing? Publishing books, public speaking and promoting his own ideas on how on legal strategy and related issues in family court. Goldstein is also promoting his books at the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC) — which what Claudine says is “profiting off the suffering of mothers”.

What is the difference – Goldstein has Claudine’s support, and he offers Claudine support in return. Goldstein is willing to look the other way when the law is broken by Claudine and the Attack Mothers (AMPP). Goldstein looks the other way when mothers and advocates are victimized, even when it is happening on his own Facebook wall.

 

Goldstein endorses Claudine’s vision for tearing down the Mother’s Movement because he has a starring role in it.

Claudine Dombrowski is one of Goldstein’s strongest supporters, and on several of Dombrowksi’s attacking blogs, Goldstein is openly promoted by linking his blog, reposting his article or posting his actual photograph. Claudine has created these attack blogs using the names of targeted victims, publishing their personal information (spouse, home address, e-mail, phone number etc) without their consent. On these blogs, Claudine writes vulgar and defamatory articles about the victim–all the while promoting Goldstein on those very sites! Once again, Goldstein shows he is willing to look the other way, and remain silent while an abuser terrorizes her victims.

Barry Goldstein praises Claudine Dombrowski and says it is wrong for Bill Windsor to defend himself against her attacks, even after Claudine threatened Bill’s life

The hate sites are mentioned in Bill Windsor’s affidavit against Claudine, “She stalks and defames a number of local attorneys, doctors, and social workers by setting up websites in their names. Note that she publishes all of their personal information – name, address, phone, email, and more. These websites were set up before she and her organization and associates began stalking me. It demonstrates a pattern and practice of wrongful behavior by DOMBROWSKI…” (see #7,
http://claudinedombrowski.com/?p=148)

How can Barry Goldstein ignore what is happening –isn’t he a domestic violence advocate? This is abuse!

Bill Windsor states Claudine Dombrowski’s actions constitute stalking and harassment; Claudine responds by giving him the “middle finger”

ATW noticed a similar pattern of behavior on Goldstein’s Facebook wall—with the worst of attacks happening in the Summer of 2013. Several mothers contacted ATW to complain. Publicly, AMPP supporters were attacking moms and advocates, using obscenities and disgusting language. One AMPP supporter even outed a protective mom using an alias, and revealed her true identity. It seemed that AMPP supporters were hovering over Goldstein’s wall, provoking and looking for an opportunity to attack. Goldstein’s response included the following: Deleting comments of those attempting to defend themselves. Leaving comments up of those abusing or harassing others. Ignoring the actual abuse. Choosing to work with, and alongside the abusers. To this day, Claudine and AMPP Attack Mothers continue to post on Barry’s wall, and share his support.

In response to Lundy Bancroft’s letter to denounce abuse in the Mother’s Movement, and stop working with abusers, it appears that Barry Goldstein’s response is to rally support for Claudine—his statement is then reposted on a hate blog she created to viciously attack and slander PMA International co-founder, Janice Levinson.

http://janicelevinson .blogspot.com/2 013/07/wh eres-evid ence-you-asked. html

Barry Goldstein’s support of Claudine Dombrowksi appears on a hate blog that is filled with profanity, disgusting sexual material, defamation and vicious attacks

Barry refers to Claudine as a “legitimate protective mom”. What is that? Under whose standard is a “legitimate protective mom”… or “legitimate rape”?

Barry goes on to say that “good work and sincere people are doing to reform the broken system..”

If we are to believe Barry then “good work” would include this hate site, created using Levinson’s name in the blog address without her consent. The “sincere people” who created this blog “to reform the broken system” use profanity, verbal abuse, disgusting sexual jokes and pictures, defamation, identity theft and steal artwork from the Holocaust Memorial Museum in their campaign of harassment. This disgusting blog became the platform where Barry’s support of Claudine was showcased. Again, a similar pattern as Barry being promoted on Claudine’s other hate blogs—this has been going on for years.

Barry Goldstein’s support for Claudine Dombrowski appeared on this disgusting hate site where his “friend” Janice Levinson of PMA is being openly attacked and slandered

Barry then uses “victim blaming” – a common tactic of abusers where they denigrate and blame the victim, often stating they are deserving of abuse, in order to avoid responsibility for their actions. Barry uses victim blaming by stating that both Bill Windsor (Lawless America) and Janice Levinson are just misunderstanding Claudine. Barry moves on to attack Windsor by stating the abuse is just a “personal issue” on his part. And even though stating Levinson is a “friend”, Barry similarly attacks her by reaffirming Claudine’s comments Levinson is “undermining” the Mother’s Movement. No Barry—abuse “undermines” the Mother’s Movement, and efforts to protect mothers and children.

Almost a year has passed since this post was created, and published all over the internet, and Barry has done nothing to dispute its content. Clearly, Barry supports Claudine and the AMPP Attack Mothers, and supports abuse by allowing his words to justify their criminal behavior and also by allowing his name and professional work to be used on blogs that are clearly created for stalking and harassment—to intimidate and cause fear not only to its victims, but to other protective moms and domestic violence organizations as well.

In the months that have passed, Windsor presented evidence before a court of law, and petitioned for a protective order against Claudine—which was granted. That is to say, a reasonable person looking at Claudine’s actions—including screenshots of her various hate sites, online attacks, death threats, instances of identity theft and worse views these actions as criminal and threatening. Those who support Claudine, support criminal stalking, defamation and harassment.

Claudine Dombrowski threatens to shoot Bill Windsor – WHY is she supported by Barry Goldstein and the Mother’s Movement?

According to Claudine, the “old” Mother’s Movement “is not good, it is oppressive” and “the movement must change..” Barry Goldstein has followed this need for change, and show strong support of Claudine.

Are these the advocates we are to trust?

And what is the Mother’s Movement changing into??