Lorraine Tipton of American Mothers Political Party Pt. II: Abuser or Advocate?

LORRAINE TIPTON ADVOCATE OR ABUSER?

Lorraine Tipton, the steely cold side of the Mother’s Movement

This is just a sample of documented acts of online bullying and cyberstalking committed by Lorraine Tipton; her criminal actions well exceed this list, and ATW will continue to reveal the truth about abusers in the Mother’s Movement.

As you read, ask yourself: “Are these the actions of a concerned abuse advocate or a dangerous abuser?” The Mother’s Movement and its leaders have been presented with the same question, as evidence of AMPP’s criminal stalking and harassment has been made public, and victims are voicing complaints…their response has so far been silence and denial, which has enabled the abuse to continue, and failed to protect the victims and vulnerable moms seeking help.

—2009 to the Present: Protective Mothers Alliance International, co-founded by author and domestic violence expert, Lundy Bancroft, and protective mom and advocate, Janice Levinson, say the American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) initiated a campaign of bullying, defamation and harassment against their organization and its members. Lorraine has participated in or instigated many of these vicious attacks.

Some of the outrageous allegations made by AMPP include: Janice Levinson is “very evil” and “very deadly” and “will mercilessly slaughter you and your children”. Lundy Bancroft has been called “the a—hole of the Mother’s Movement” and called a cult leader. Many of the attacks include vulgar and degrading sexual images and language, threats and various false allegations. ONLY an abuser would enjoy destroying and tearing down a woman, and attack those who come to her defense—how can you represent a “mother’s movement” and be an “abuse advocate” when you adopt the tactics of an abuser, and use language, videos and behavior that is clearly cruel and degrading towards women?

Lundy Bancroft’s statement at “Defending a Women’s Rights Activist Who Is Under Attack”: http://lundybancroft.blogspot.com/2013/07/defending-womens-rights-activist-who-is.html

Statement from Janice Levinson posted on the Venture Philosophy Blog: http://venturephilosophy.blogspot.com/2013/01/american-mothers-political-party-is.html

— (10/29/2010) Lorraine implicates herself as participating in online stalking, harassment and defamation with Claudine Dombrowski and “All of Us” against court officers working on Claudine Dombrowski’s custody case. Lorraine refers to the victims as “court whores”: http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/will-the-real-claudine-dombrowski-please-stand-up/

**It should be noted that Claudine has created blogs using the names of these court officers, and has posted their personal information and made various false and derogatory remarks against them all over the internet These blogs point back to Claudine because they mention details about Claudine’s case that only she would know, include information about AMPP and some of them are even written using the name “William M. Windsor” (why is Claudine impersonating Bill Windsor?!?).

–(2010 -Present) Lorraine wrongly believes that defamation, bullying and hate speech is protected by the First Amendment. The cover of the MamaLiberty blog says, “I am protected by the First Amendment that gives me freedom of speech, so get the f—over yourselves”. Is this the professionalism of an abuse advocate and “leader” in the Mother’s Movement or the gutter mouth of an abuser who does not care how her words and actions affect others???

–(10/22/2010) Lorraine again admits to cyberstalking and terrorizing court officers involved in Claudine’s case, “So they claim that Claudine Dombrowski is everywhere…posting this….posting that….posting on her facebook page…CYBERSTALKING HER or was it HER???”

And “I assure all of the idiots from Shawnee County right now that WE are everywhere…Claudine is our HERO…we love and cherish everyday that she has been in our lives…because we have had our own DIS-honarable Judge Debenhams in our life too….we have had our own court whore like Jill M. Dykes….WE ARE CLAUDINE! WE ARE EVERYWHERE!!”

There is more.. “We are not going to give up, shut up or go away….sorry. Gag the internet…..but the internet is here to stay and so are we. Ten years ago you would never find the social networking we have today. Thank you facebook….thank you MySpace…thank you Al Gore! You might be able to threaten a protective mother to not post anything and violate her first amendment rights….but you cannot GAG us all.” http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/where-in-the-world-is-claudine-dombrowski/

What has been posted? ATW has reviewed these hateful blogs that contain disturbing sexual material (accusing one victim of having “the dry vagina hots” for her clients), outrageous false allegations that the supervised visitation facility is involved in child trafficking, identity theft of the victims, swearing and name calling, posting personal contact information about the victims, and worse…these blogs still remain on the internet.

See a pattern forming? Dr. Phil says the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior…

–(10/22/2010) Lorraine Tipton engages in victim blaming, she believes that the people she has cyberstalked and terrorized deserve to be abused or did something to provoke her, “Your askew view has made you the target….YOU DID THIS to yourself.” http://mamaliberty.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/where-in-the-world-is-claudine-dombrowski/

Victim blaming has also been used by Lorraine to justify attacks on Bill Windsor, Lundy Bancroft, and Janice Levinson.

Lorraine says Bill Windsor deserves to be cyberstalked because he is a “refractory bigamist” and “Windsor’s stooges seem to be caught up in their need for enemies.”

Lorraine Tipton/Mama Liberty: Lawless Supporters are Laughable Pissants, Psychotic Fruitcakes: http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/02/19/mama-liberty-laughable-pissants/

–(1/7 to 1/9/2011) At the 2011, Battered Mother’s Custody Conference (BMCC), “Badass Mama”Lorraine Tipton revealed the following ,”How internet groups allow us to form tribes of mothers over long distances and sparsely populated areas through the use of technology and How “To’s” to Safely set up blogs, link and linking, news features to AMPP network -via the BADASS Success.”http://imaginepublicity.com/2010/12/03/3372/

All of which is a blue print for the AMPP cyber gang of Attack Mothers who work together to stalk, terrorize and harass victims online.

See also how the Glenns Cult/Petunia Pig refers to both the AMPP “Anonymums” and the “Badass Mamas”… coincidence???

–2012 to the Present: AMPP members (including Lorraine and Claudine Dombrowski) individually and collectively as a group (also joining in with the Joeys) begin stalk, harass, slander, and threaten Bill Windsor, creator of the “Lawless America” documentary exposing government corruption.

Read Bill’s AMPP Hate Group Expose here: http://www.americanmotherspoliticalparty.com/

Naomi Chambers video on harassment from American Mothers Political Party: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3c2LSn4fRU

—Lorraine also has attacked several protective moms, and cannot be an advocate because she is hurting other moms, who are vulnerable and traumatized and deserve to be protected, NOT intimidated by Lorraine and AMPP.

ATW has viewed a photograph of one protective mom featured on Lorraine’s blog with loving comments next to her name—you would think she is a friend. WRONG! Lorraine later follows up on this beautiful picture by gossiping and making negative comments of an embarrassing nature against this poor protective mom. ATW has screenshots to prove this, and the only reasons they are not posted is to protect this protective mom from further embarrassment.

—Using the name “Rainy68”, under the AMPP account, created and posted hateful videos about Bill Windsor and his government corruption documentary, “Lawless America” online. Including “The Pie Man Floateth”

Lorraine Tipton posting nasty videos about Bill Windsor on YouTube. Not the similarities between “The Pie Man Floateth” and Julia Focker’s “Bitler” videos.

—Using her real name Lorraine Tipton, posted and passed around another hateful video called “Bitler” by the alias “Julia Focker”. Once again slandering Bill Windsor but also mocking the Holocaust and disrespecting the memory of the 10 million victims murdered. You have to be an evil person to laugh about the Holocaust, and twist this tragedy to use to your own benefit.

–-Lorraine has joined in acts of cyberstalking, bullying, harassment and defamation on the Joeys blog. Targets include Bill Windsor (Lawless America), Lundy Bancroft (domestic violence author & speaker, co-founder of Protective Mothers Alliance International, PMA), Janice Levinson (protective mom, co-founder of PMA) and other protective moms, and anyone she feels is a threat.

— Lorraine has declared “war” on fellow abuse advocacy group, Protective Mothers Alliance International (PMA). Lorraine has viciously attacked and slandered both of its founders, Lundy Bancroft and Janice Levinson. Lorraine has also attacked and slandered anyone who supports PMA—including other protective moms.

Is There Really a “War” in the Mother’s Movement?: http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/04/07/war-mothers-movement/

–(2/2/2013) Lorraine gossiped and made fun of advocates and protective mothers at the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC) then posted her false, and embarrassing statements on the Joeys site for all to see. According to Lorraine, she only went to the BMCC to see Barry Goldstein; and referred to other advocates as “stupid” and “a hole”.

Lorraine Tipton, on the BMCC (The steely cold side of “mother’s rights” unmasked and unedited: http://abusiveadvocates.com/2013/05/02/lorraine-tipton-bmcc/

— According to a post on the Joeys, Lorraine lives at 666 Go F—Yourself Blvd in Hell USA 666666. Fitting because Lorraine has a strong interest in paganism and witchcraft: http://www.meetup.com/members/9187421/

http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=397862658

Husband Chad Tipton is also part of a social group for pagans.

—Made death threats to Bill Windsor

(Feb 25, 2013) Bill Windsor, of Lawless America, files criminal charges against Lorraine Tipton, Claudine Dombrowski and other members of AMPP, the Mothers Movement or the Joeys for harassment and cyberstalking: http://allieoverstreet.com/?tag=lorraine-tipton

So… do you think Lorraine Tipton is an abusive advocate or an abuser? Leave your comments below! Stay tuned as ATW continues to expose abusers hiding in the Mother’s Movement..

Abusers in the Mother’s Movement Pt 2: Barry Goldstein &AMPP; Claudine Dombrowski

CLAUDINE & AMPP: DISMANTLE THE MOTHER’S MOVEMENT

According to Claudine a change is needed in the Mother’s Movement, it should be torn down completely, and she will lead these efforts, along with her hand selected allies “DV orgs, awareness?? seriously?? They need to be dismantled and a new what is needed now– begun.”

AND, “Its out with the old in with the new and dammit what we are doing is not working. The moms know this they are the change and with strategy, political and legal. Now moving because of the strength of mothers coming out — then the movement must to change to support and foster that growth. eg. Barry strategy Representing the DV victim, BMCC learning to lobby… you see old is not good it is oppressive.”

Reply to Lundy Bancroft – Change is here, Lead, Follow or get out of the way. Human Rights. July 20, 2013. http:// claudinedombrowski.blog spot. com

As you read Claudine’s delusional letter, it strongly appears that she thought she was able to control Bancroft, and that she was somehow responsible for his success. Those feelings since have transferred to Barry.

Claudine attacks Lundy Bancroft in order to prop up Barry Goldstein – no one in the Mother’s Movement objects to this kind of abusive, and manipulative behavior

See for yourself…

This is how Claudine described Bancroft, at the beginning of the Mother’s Movement, when she supported him: “Then he published more books, does speaking, became our voice, the voice of the beaten, trembling, terrified battered mother..” (Note: There is NO indication that Bancroft wanted or asked for any recognition for his advocacy work for battered women, nor did he ever take credit for being “the voice” of battered women.)

What is Barry Goldstein doing? Publishing books, public speaking and promoting his own ideas on how on legal strategy and related issues in family court. Goldstein is also promoting his books at the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC) — which what Claudine says is “profiting off the suffering of mothers”.

What is the difference – Goldstein has Claudine’s support, and he offers Claudine support in return. Goldstein is willing to look the other way when the law is broken by Claudine and the Attack Mothers (AMPP). Goldstein looks the other way when mothers and advocates are victimized, even when it is happening on his own Facebook wall.

 

Goldstein endorses Claudine’s vision for tearing down the Mother’s Movement because he has a starring role in it.

Claudine Dombrowski is one of Goldstein’s strongest supporters, and on several of Dombrowksi’s attacking blogs, Goldstein is openly promoted by linking his blog, reposting his article or posting his actual photograph. Claudine has created these attack blogs using the names of targeted victims, publishing their personal information (spouse, home address, e-mail, phone number etc) without their consent. On these blogs, Claudine writes vulgar and defamatory articles about the victim–all the while promoting Goldstein on those very sites! Once again, Goldstein shows he is willing to look the other way, and remain silent while an abuser terrorizes her victims.

Barry Goldstein praises Claudine Dombrowski and says it is wrong for Bill Windsor to defend himself against her attacks, even after Claudine threatened Bill’s life

The hate sites are mentioned in Bill Windsor’s affidavit against Claudine, “She stalks and defames a number of local attorneys, doctors, and social workers by setting up websites in their names. Note that she publishes all of their personal information – name, address, phone, email, and more. These websites were set up before she and her organization and associates began stalking me. It demonstrates a pattern and practice of wrongful behavior by DOMBROWSKI…” (see #7,
http://claudinedombrowski.com/?p=148)

How can Barry Goldstein ignore what is happening –isn’t he a domestic violence advocate? This is abuse!

Bill Windsor states Claudine Dombrowski’s actions constitute stalking and harassment; Claudine responds by giving him the “middle finger”

ATW noticed a similar pattern of behavior on Goldstein’s Facebook wall—with the worst of attacks happening in the Summer of 2013. Several mothers contacted ATW to complain. Publicly, AMPP supporters were attacking moms and advocates, using obscenities and disgusting language. One AMPP supporter even outed a protective mom using an alias, and revealed her true identity. It seemed that AMPP supporters were hovering over Goldstein’s wall, provoking and looking for an opportunity to attack. Goldstein’s response included the following: Deleting comments of those attempting to defend themselves. Leaving comments up of those abusing or harassing others. Ignoring the actual abuse. Choosing to work with, and alongside the abusers. To this day, Claudine and AMPP Attack Mothers continue to post on Barry’s wall, and share his support.

In response to Lundy Bancroft’s letter to denounce abuse in the Mother’s Movement, and stop working with abusers, it appears that Barry Goldstein’s response is to rally support for Claudine—his statement is then reposted on a hate blog she created to viciously attack and slander PMA International co-founder, Janice Levinson.

http://janicelevinson .blogspot.com/2 013/07/wh eres-evid ence-you-asked. html

Barry Goldstein’s support of Claudine Dombrowksi appears on a hate blog that is filled with profanity, disgusting sexual material, defamation and vicious attacks

Barry refers to Claudine as a “legitimate protective mom”. What is that? Under whose standard is a “legitimate protective mom”… or “legitimate rape”?

Barry goes on to say that “good work and sincere people are doing to reform the broken system..”

If we are to believe Barry then “good work” would include this hate site, created using Levinson’s name in the blog address without her consent. The “sincere people” who created this blog “to reform the broken system” use profanity, verbal abuse, disgusting sexual jokes and pictures, defamation, identity theft and steal artwork from the Holocaust Memorial Museum in their campaign of harassment. This disgusting blog became the platform where Barry’s support of Claudine was showcased. Again, a similar pattern as Barry being promoted on Claudine’s other hate blogs—this has been going on for years.

Barry Goldstein’s support for Claudine Dombrowski appeared on this disgusting hate site where his “friend” Janice Levinson of PMA is being openly attacked and slandered

Barry then uses “victim blaming” – a common tactic of abusers where they denigrate and blame the victim, often stating they are deserving of abuse, in order to avoid responsibility for their actions. Barry uses victim blaming by stating that both Bill Windsor (Lawless America) and Janice Levinson are just misunderstanding Claudine. Barry moves on to attack Windsor by stating the abuse is just a “personal issue” on his part. And even though stating Levinson is a “friend”, Barry similarly attacks her by reaffirming Claudine’s comments Levinson is “undermining” the Mother’s Movement. No Barry—abuse “undermines” the Mother’s Movement, and efforts to protect mothers and children.

Almost a year has passed since this post was created, and published all over the internet, and Barry has done nothing to dispute its content. Clearly, Barry supports Claudine and the AMPP Attack Mothers, and supports abuse by allowing his words to justify their criminal behavior and also by allowing his name and professional work to be used on blogs that are clearly created for stalking and harassment—to intimidate and cause fear not only to its victims, but to other protective moms and domestic violence organizations as well.

In the months that have passed, Windsor presented evidence before a court of law, and petitioned for a protective order against Claudine—which was granted. That is to say, a reasonable person looking at Claudine’s actions—including screenshots of her various hate sites, online attacks, death threats, instances of identity theft and worse views these actions as criminal and threatening. Those who support Claudine, support criminal stalking, defamation and harassment.

Claudine Dombrowski threatens to shoot Bill Windsor – WHY is she supported by Barry Goldstein and the Mother’s Movement?

According to Claudine, the “old” Mother’s Movement “is not good, it is oppressive” and “the movement must change..” Barry Goldstein has followed this need for change, and show strong support of Claudine.

Are these the advocates we are to trust?

And what is the Mother’s Movement changing into??

 

Court loophole puts mom and child at risk, no criminal charges for father who abducted child

Family Court loophole puts mom and child at risk, no criminal charges for father who abducted child: Razwan Ali Anjum, abducted his 3 yr old daughter in Nov. 2009 and hid her in Pakistan with family members, refusing to reveal her whereabouts even after being jailed. The child is returned 3 years later, at age 6, the search deterred when detectives were sent on a wildgoose chase by Razwan, who lied and refused to provide answers as to the child’s location. Razwan wass charged with 12 months in jail for contempt–and given a reduced sentence, he also avoided criminal charges for the abduction because family court only handles “civil” matters. Now released from jail Razwan is trying to get Legal Aid so he can sue for custody.

FULL STORY:

United Kingdom: On November 6 2009, Gemma Wilkinson (of Ashton-under-Lyne) sent her 3 yr old daughter Atiya on a birthday visit with her father, Razwan Ali Anjum. What was supposed to be a happy day was the beginning of a nightmare. Razwan sent a text to Gemma that she “would never see her daughter again” then smuggled Atiya into Pakistan.

On November 20, Razwan returned to the UK–without Atiya– claiming he did not know what had happened to the child. Razwan lied and refused to provide information when questioned by the authorities. Razwan also lied when he told authorities that he sold his daughter to an Iranian man. Razwan was jailed for contempt for refusing to reveal Atiya’s whereabouts. Razwan was held at Forest Bank Prison in Salford for 3 years because he refused to reveal where Atiya was hidden; prosecutors remarked it is remarkable that Razwan was jailed for long and refused to cooperate.

For three long, painful years Gemma searched for her daughter–now subject of an international manhunt. Atiya, grew up without the love of her mother, and was used as a pawn in her father’s vicious retaliation against her mother. A judge working on this case would later remark that Razwan has “demonstrated the most cynical and cruel behavior he had dealt with in 30 years”.

With the help of the Pakistani government, and tips from local citizens, Atiya was finally located Sialkot, in the Punjab province on Dec 24, 2012; she was staying with paternal relatives. Atiya was flown back to the UK where she was joyfully reunited with her mother, Gemma.

Gemma was overwhelmed to be reunited with Atiya at the Manchester Airport, showering her with hugs and kisses, and bringing presents from every year of her birthday that was missed. Atiya is reported to be adjusting well in Gemma’s care, is happy and has begun to refer to Gemma as “Mummy”.

Here is where it gets complicated.. Razwan was jailed for contempt in October 2012, and sentenced to 12 months for refusing to disclose where Atiya was hidden (previous charges for contempt added up to a total of 2 years and 12 months). When Atiya was found in December, Razwan petitioned the court for an early release because she had been returned home safely. Keep in mind Razwan had exposed his daughter to great danger and kidnapped her from the custody of her mother, attempting to sever a sacred bond of mother and child. Razwan created an international wild goose chase, where detectives faced difficult situations that risked their safety, and expended a great deal of money and manpower–looking in the wrong direction. Razwan even lied that he sold Atiya to an Iranian man–you can imagine the absolute horror, and panic Gemma experienced on hearing that news, and the possibility her daughter was being abused in the worst way. Gemma appeared before the media a number of times, tearfully begging for the return of her daughter–to which Razwan showed no sympathy, no emotion. The amount of suffering Razwan imposed is beyond words–he deserved no leniency, and should have been subjected to harsh criminal penalty.

Justice Holman, sitting in the family division at the Royal Courts of Justice commented “the human cruelty..to the mother can scarcely be overstated”. Yet on hearing Razwan’s petition for an early release, Justice Holman granted an early release of two months because he did not want to give the appearance that Razwan was being “coerced” into providing information.
Razwan got an even better deal due to a legal loophole.. Under the 1984 Child Abduction Act, Razwan could have faced up to 7 years in jail for kidnapping (and may have been given time served for his contempt charges). HOWEVER Proceedings demanding the return of a child are considered a “civil matter” and handled in family court. SO Razwan was not only released from jail two months early but to date, never criminally charged with abduction.

Razwan is reported to be totally without remorse for his actions and refers to Gemma as “only or merely her birth mother”. Gemma lives in fear that Azwan will kidnap Atiya again. The Foreign Office reports that the number of parental abduction cases they have dealt with has increased by 88% in less than a decade.
Once released, Razwan has begun to fight for visitation with Atiya–and incredibly this case is proceeding in family court like a normal petition. Razwan appeared at Liverpool’s Civil and Family Court in Liverpool to petition for custody to return Atiya to Pakistan and apply for legal aid. Psychological evaluations of Atiya were conducted in July 2013. At the time this article was written, the results of the case are still pending.

Gemma lives at a secret address with Atiya, and has said she will oppose custody. They are working to rebuild their lives, and create many happy memories for all the years they have lost.

For More on this Story:
“Abducted Atiya Anjum-Wilkinson returns to UK from Pakistan”. The Guardian, Helen Pidd, Shiv Malik, and Jason Burke South Asia correspondent. 12/28/2012: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/28/abducted-atiya-wilkinson-return-pakistan

“Atiya Anjum-Wilkinson: Father in Court Bid for Access”. BBC News Manchester, 3/15/2013: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-21802671

“Father of abducted girl must remain in jail, judge rules”. The Guardian, 1/14/2013: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/father-abducted-atiya-remain-jail

“I’m Afriad Atiya’s dad will snatch her again, says Ashton mum as jail sentence cut” . Manchester Evening News, 1/15/2013: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/im-terrified-atiyas-dad-will-snatch-1210285

Six-year-old Antiya Anjum-Wilkinson back home in the UK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdE8_zajGwo

Claudine Dombrowski & the BMCC – Abuser in the Spotlight

A.T.W. recognizes that there really are grave injustices occurring in family court, that women who escape abuse are being re-victimized by systematic failures, and childrens’ lives are at risk when placed in the care and custody of an abuser. Abused women and their children facing divorce, visitation and custody disputes are desperately in need of help and support. The creation of the BMCC was an important step to raise awareness about the issues, and bring people together to work for change…but then something went horribly wrong.

What is the Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC)?

The Battered Mothers Custody Conference (BMCC) was created in 2003 by two mothers, Mo Hannah P.h.D. and Liliane Heller Miller to create a public forum to discuss the issues battered women, and their children, struggle against dealing with divorce, visitation and custody with an abusive ex. The BMCC also raises awareness about unjust family court, CPS & systematic failures that fail to protect women and children from abuse, and often wrongfully deprive them of their rights–and custody of their children.

Claudine Dombrowski & the BMCC – Abuser in the Spotlight

For years, Claudine Dombrowski has been a speaker at the BMCC (beginning in 2004, according to her Linked In profile). Claudine portrays herself as American Mothers Political Party or it’s co-founder (AMPP) she also credits herself as a “CEO at AMPP”, “Domestic Violence Expert” and “Advocate”. If Claudine is any of these, it makes her actions even more egregious.

What is the co-founder of a victim advocacy group doing abusing, stalking and harassing people?

How can a “domestic violence expert” go to “war” with fellow abuse advocates and organize vicious online attacks, and have any credibility at all?

What is Claudine “advocating“–stealing art from the US Holocaust Museum in order to portray her victims as “Nazis”, filing false FBI reports, joining with a known group of bullies to attack others, creating hate blogs with false and misleading information about her victims…her actions are clearly those of an abuser, NOT an “advocate” or “domestic violence expert”.

8th Annual BMCC – Claudine Demonstrates How to be an Online Stalker

What is the BMCC and its related organizations doing supporting Claudine, and allowing her to be an “honored presenter” at its conference?

At the 2011, 8th Annual BMCC, Claudine presented tips on how to be an online stalker, or the politically correct term, according to Claudine, is, “We will specifically outline how we have become united and how every mother can also be a part of the online revolution of networked bloggers– no matter where you are.”

Stalking tips include:

– “How internet groups allow us to form tribes of mothers over long distances and sparsely populated areas through the use of technology”. Which has been used by AMPP to connect with the Flying Monkeys aka the Joeys, Australian AMPP and other supporters who then go on to bully others, creating cyber gangs.

-“How to set up blogs, link and linking, news features to AMPP network”.

Which has been used by AMPP to connect with bullies over the internet and Facebook, often using aliases to avoid detection. To connect on webpages and those stealing the name/profile/identity of a victim..and otherwise using the internet to form a cyber gang with the intent to bully, intimidate and harass people.

–” Unity does not require the physical body just the unity of our minds and spirits” meaning anyone who will oppose, question or speak contrary about AMPP will become its next target. Or, alternately, the connecting of individuals whose mission is to bully people by joining online websites, FB groups, creating vulgar & demeaning YouTube videos, leaving comments across the internet and jumping anyone with online attacks if they raise concerns..all of this has been committed by AMPP.

Reading this outline, as presented by Claudine, clearly shows that AMPP’s speech at the BMCC was a thinly veiled lesson on what tactics they use in their online attacks–and one has to wonder if Claudine manipulated the BMCC to further her own agenda.

BREAKING NEWS: Just came in on a tornado from Kansas!!!

Claudine is NO LONGER an “advocate”.

According to Claudine: “So simply put. Advocates are the same slough of people who have personal agendas – usually none care at all about the victims…I am not an advocate.” http://janicelevinson.blogspot.com/2013_04_01_archive.html

With this amount of animosity towards Domestic Violence Advocates, should Claudine even be at the BMCC?

Nevermind the numerous online sites, and her own blog and Twitter account, where Claudine claims to be an advocate! Wonder if she is giving up the broom stick too? If so, maybe she should just ride her bike..

Female Abusers NOT WELCOME in AMPP

Based on this statement, does this mean:

** That, as of Feb 1st, American Mothers Political Party (AMPP) is now devoid of members?

** AMPP has attacked Bill Windsor for removing abusive women  from Lawless America, does this mean that AMPP will be doing the same..if so what is the difference?

** “I cannot clarify this enough” implies that AMPP is serious about removing abusers from it’s group, so when will they take action against the members who have engaged in harassment, cyberstalking, bullying, threats and other abusive behavior?

 

Stay tuned for more examples of abuse & hypocrisy from AMPP.